WikiLeaks have also begun publishing unusual information, making some believe that the whistleblowing organisation has become compromised ever since Assange’s Internet was mysteriously cut in October.
Shortly after, outrage and fear sparked as Assange’s wellbeing instantly became unknown, and the Wikileaks foundation immediately began investigating.
According to Wikileaks, Assange’s Internet was abruptly cut on October 15, 2016 at 5PM GMT. The organization said it occurred shortly after the publication of Clinton’s Goldman Sachs speeches. A leak that proved Hillary had done paid speeches for the mega-bank, with an official transcript being leaked.
After Assange’s Internet dropped for “unknown reasons,” Wikileaks went on to explain that “Julian Assange’s internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party.” Further acknowledging “we have activated the appropriate contingency plans.”
Following the date Assange’s Internet dropped, both the Wikileaks foundation and their Twitter have been acting quite irregular.
Shortly after Assange’s Internet had been severed, the Wikileaks foundation sent out a series of cryptic tweets (October 16th):
*These are a bundle of SHA256 hashes
An unexpected drop in hashes is not something Wikileaks has a history of doing, especially in the fashion they dropped. Without any context from the foundation, the community has had to interpret these hashes for themselves, leading a majority to concluded this is an encryption commitment scheme. To date, these have still not been confirmed.
Following the drops, the community has gone into investigation mode to try and identify what these could be related to. After scanning the Wikileaks site and even the Wikileaks insurance torrent, none of the hashes match up. People even speculated that the drops could have been the official keys or passwords to the encrypted files within the wikileaks insurance torrent, however, this turned out untrue as well. Meaning these hashes have nothing to do with the information that is currently published.
It is clear that precommitment is being used, presumably as a deterrent to retaliation from an opponent.
“Precommitment is a strategy in which a party to a conflict uses a commitment device to strengthen its position by cutting off some of its options to make its threats more credible. Any party employing a Strategy of Deterrence faces the problem that retaliating against an attack may ultimately result in significant damage to their own side.”
Was Assange captured/extradited?
Internet capabilities were to be restored to Assange following the election, however, he has still not been granted access to any network capabilities.
People believe cryptic the tweets could have been Assange’s cry for help. Following these drops there has still been no official statement from the new Wikileaks Twitter controller. After the foundation said a state party had intentionally severed his connection and in-turn they activated the appropriate contingency plans. Is this not indirectly acknowledged a dead mans switch?
What’s significant about these cryptic tweets is the mention of John Kerry, the current secretary of state. Kerry just happened to be near London during the time Assange’s coonection dropped. According to news outlets Kerry was there to allegedly renew Syrian peace efforts. However, Wikileaks reported: “BREAKING: Multiple US sources tell us John Kerry asked Ecuador to stop Assange from publishing Clinton docs during FARC peace negotiations.”
After that hit, Wikileaks dropped yet another bombshell: “The John Kerry private meeting with Ecuador was made on the sidelines of the negotiations which took place pricipally on Sep 26 in Colombia.”
During this time supporters of Wikileaks actually responded to Assange’s presumed dead mans switch by meeting outside the Ecuadorian embassy Assange has been stuck in since 2012. One supporter setup a live stream using periscope which had accumulated several thousands of viewers and abruptly lost connection for unknown reasons. Several attendees outside said the stream dropped once an “unnamed crew” showed up and entered the embassy. That same person hasn’t used their Twitter account since that night, October 19-20th.
Again, Assange was never seen during this time.
A couple of days following this Wikileaks randomly tweeted: “PHOTO: Heavily armed ‘police’ appear outside Ecuadorian Embassy in London where Julian Assange has political asylum (photo, Tuesday morning)”
The foundation unexpectedly tweeted out this information. As well, during this time there have been reports that people in neighboring areas of the embassy have had SWAT confiscate their phone and bar entry into streets neighboring the embassy. People have been discussing this online and on Twitter as well.
Was Assange Privately Flown out of London
Now this is one we won’t entirely dissect here as it is just massive. But according to publicly crowd-sourced information from Reddit, private jets from military bases tied to the CIA in London were being flown out at the exact times Assange was believed to have been detained. There are even images on public flight maps and radars showing the private jet taking off from its base and landing in a military base in the USA. The radar showing the plane eventually went down, now only images detaling the flight are available.
The Reddit comments give an even deeper dive into multiple airports, the actual plane Assange could have been extradited on, and where he could actually be.
Wikileaks Twitter Takes a New & Biased Look on Politics
One core principle behind the Wikileaks foundation is their usual unbiased outlook. Regardless of where the leaks came from, which country it may affect or who they may hurt, Wikileaks will always publish documents they receive.
As the leaks were targeting the presidential election, it’s extremely important that Wikileaks keeps an unbiased outlook. This was one of the great things Assange promised before the Hillary leaks even began dropping. The foundation has stuck beside this core message for the past 10 years, but not so much in the past month.
Following Assange losing Internet, the Wikileaks Twitter quickly began to take a quite bias outlook. Mind you, Wikileaks Twitter used to be just a long list of leaks and links, acting almost robotic with no opinion. Somewhere the foundation took a complete 180 and went from never liking a post and rarely sharing articles, to resharing bias Politico articles as well as liking and unliking bias tweets over time. Not only this but the Twitter account even began making veiled threats.
This is not common Wikileaks activity and has never been expressed in the past 10 years.
Podesta Emails Losing Heat While Email Numbers Not Matching Up
It’s no secret that the earlier Podesta leaks contained things we had never once imagined in politics, but it’s as if the recent leaks have lost their sensation. Undoubtedly less people will be following the leaks now that the election has wrapped up, but it’s almost as if the new leaks contain less and less information.
Not only have they been loosing steam, but Reddit users discovered a discrepancy in the daily email leak count. They discovered the most recent leak is missing some 598 emails.
After hours of scouring Wikileaks, users were able to make up a small portion of the emails that had been hidden and not indexed.
Where are the emails? Has the foundation been compromised and third-party actors are scrubbing recent leaks? The possibility seems quite unreal, but there is even more cry[tpgraphic evidence against WikiLeaks.
The Reddit AMA Disaster
Wikileaks decided to host an “Ask Me Anything” on Reddit just last week, this type of thread was intended for the public to be able to ask the Wikileaks staff anything they pleased, and staffers could openly respond. For an AMA to be hosted on Reddit, the account owners have to go through approval to verify they are the person or organization who they claim, whether it be an actor, politician, band or even whistleblower.
Well this is where it gets a little weird and tin-foiley but with some proof backing it. First, the staff only verified that it was them through their Wikileaks twitter account with a simple tweet. The Wikileaks staff had attempted to post a selfie to Imgur, however the upload failed and staffers never updated it. Mind you, one of the moderators of the widely popular AMA subreddit, the one who verified the Wikileaks AMA, just up and deleted their account. Now the moderators of the AMA subreddit are not just your run of the mill Reddit users, they are often paid Reddit employee.
Many questions went unanswered and overall the AMA was handled very poorly. Unlike the foundations past AMA’s which were extremely well documented and informed.
On top of this when the Wikileaks staffers talked with other AMA staffers about verification, they never once offered a PGP signature. Mods are stating these claims aloud on Reddit. Why would they bother making a big deal out of their signed PGP keys if they aren’t willing to use them?
Cryptographic Errors, Hashes are Not Matching the Insurance Files
Now this is really where this story takes a turn for the worse. Say what you will about the above, but this is possibly proof that something has gone fatally wrong.
To start, Wikileaks is not even signing their own press releases with their PGP keys they advertise widely on the site. This seems quite uncommon as all the earlier Podesta leaks were signed with DKIM keys, authenticating each email. So why wouldn’t Wikileaks authenticate their own statements? Should we assume the author doesn’t have the ability to authenticate their posts?
If you want to learn more about PGP you can read EFF’s introduction, but in short basically whoever holds the private key is the only one who can sign their PGP signature. Unless of course the private key has been stolen or cracked.
Even when the foundation has been pressed for any kind of PGP statement, we are met with complete silence.
What’s even more damning is that the latest insurance files published by Wikileaks do not match the pre-commitment hashes they tweeted out in October. Again, Reddit users have done a breakdown on the hashes with links, and the comments give even more insight. Now we are aware that Reddit is not a “reliable” source of information, however, everything listed is public information. Proving that the Wikileaks hashes don’t match.
Other forums have pointed out that the actual torrent hosted on Wikileaks has changed as well as other minor site alterations.
Now there are definitely plausible reasons the hashses could change. The file could have become corrupted at some point during transit, the files could have needed to be rehashed since Assange lost Internet, or the original hash could have even been incorrect. Though, Wikileaks has had a pretty stellar 10 years and has rarely if ever made a quite complex mistake like this.
Or this could be the dead mans switch we were waiting for. Wikileaks could be compromised and we could be waiting for the keys to drop. If the Wikileaks Twitter was compromised and the foundation has been taken over them the switches could be suppressed. Especially amid the massive DDoS attacks striking the general Internet and Wikileaks in particular.
Now THIS is weird! Sounds like this interview was to satisfy the masses of his safety but was highly edited - also big huge red flag that there is no mention of the recent events.
Links to sources at the source link as I am using my phone to post this and it's too complicated adding all that in