This is fascinating, I would love to be able to do this for myself. I think in order to fully believe this is a real thing you have to experience it yourself otherwise that doubt will always be there no matter how much you want it to be true!
Have you ever heard about a concept called remote viewing? It is a concept that has been defined in multiple ways in recent years. Some might refer to it as the ability of some people to describe remote geographical locations located up to several hundreds of kilometers away from their original physical location.
While the concept has been proven, the mainstream scientific community does not understand how its achieved.
Several decades ago NASA’s Pioneer 10 spacecraft was launched into space, and for the first time, mankind was able to witness the very first manmade spacecraft fly directly through the asteroid belt and travel to the largest planet in our solar system, Jupiter.
Interestingly, before this happened, the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, in conjunction with Stanford Universty were involved in a project referred to as ‘Remote Viewing’. (Source) (Source)
This is where the story gets extremely interesting. According to researchers, one of the main participants of the never-before-seen research was a man called Ingo Swann, who was able to accurately view and describe a ring around Jupiter, a ring that scientists had no idea even existed. A fascinating thing about the this is that it took place right before the flyby of the Pioneer 10 Spacecraft, NASA’s mission which identified the rings around the Gas Giant. The discovery and results of the remote viewing on Jupiter were published by Stanford University in advance of the rings discovery. (Source)
The Jupiter experiment was not to be an official one. It was wrapped up in very stringent protocols. But the remote viewing raw data had to be recorded somehow so that it could be established that it existed before the NASA vehicles getting to the planet. The raw data were circulated far and wide, offered to and accepted by many respected scientists in the Silicon Valley area, including two at Jet Propulsion Laboratories (Source) – Ingo Swann
The intelligence services are heavy players; they required an active picture of Psi potentials somewhat larger than standard parapsychology could provide. Because of these unusual circumstances, I got dragged into realms of often idiotic secrecy, into endless security checks conducive of paranoia, into all kinds of science fiction DreamWorks, into intelligence intrigues whose various formats were sometimes like toilet drains, and into quite nervous military and political ramifications (Source) – Ingo Swann
Having that said, we cannot help but remember a remarkable quote by the great Nikola Tesla who said: „The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in a decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.“
Harold Puthoff Ph.D. from Stanford University and chief scientists at Stanford Research Institute, part of the Stargate Program stated in an article published in the Journal Scientific Exploration:
“To determine whether it was necessary to have a ‘beacon’ individual at the target site, Swann suggested carrying out an experiment to remote view the planet Jupiter before the upcoming NASA Pioneer 10 flyby. In that case, much to his chagrin (and ours) he found a ring around Jupiter and wondered if perhaps he had remote viewed Saturn by mistake. Our colleagues in astronomy were quite unimpressed as well until the flyby revealed that an unanticipated ring did in fact exist.” (Source) –Harold Puthoff, Ph.D., Stanford University
He added: “Successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon. Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise. The CIA even participated as remote viewers themselves in order to critique the protocols. CIA personnel generated successful target descriptions of sufficiently high quality to permit blind matching of descriptions to targets by independent judges.”– Harold Puthoff, Ph.D., Stanford University
Taking a look at the Ingo Swann’s book Penetration, he describes the many phenomena that were not documented in the literature cited in the various studies published after the successful project of remote viewing.
“It’s one thing to read about UFOs and stuff in the papers or in books. It is another to hear rumors about the military or government having an interest in such matters, rumors which say they have captured extraterrestrials and downed alien spacecraft. But it’s quite another matter to find oneself in a situation which confirms everything. I found towers, machinery, lights, buildings, humanoids busy at work on something I couldn’t figure out (on the back side of the moon).”
The fact that this project was documented by several researchers and governmental agencies makes us wonder what else is out there? How many more similar researches are being conducted as we write this? And what about extraterrestrial life? It is remarkable to think about the human potential and extended capabilities, yet it is frustrating to think about the wealth of information that is being kept from society, classified and dismissed.